This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This case serves as a critical reminder of the complexities surrounding jurisdiction in employmentlaw. Initially hired in 2007, the employee transitions to a hybrid remote work schedule in 2013 and later to a fully remote arrangement during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Regardless of the eventual amount of the verdict, this litigation dates back to 2007; litigating these types of class action lawsuits is a costly battle. According to the Law360 report, Taco Bell faced litigation because its employee handbook policy did not meet California’s strict meal and rest break requirements.
As a result, the 2010 law was relatively ineffective in curbing the dangers of operating a mobile phone while driving—namely, to text and send e-mails. Georgia employers should ensure that their employees—particularly those who operate vehicles during the course and scope of their employment—are aware of the new law and its implications.
Every business needs an employee handbook, right? Linda Itskovitz, VP of marketing for employee communications company GuideSpark, says the handbook is a very unimportant document. Linda Itskovitz, VP of marketing for employee communications company GuideSpark, says the handbook is a very unimportant document. Kill the paper.
Biometric Timekeeping Simplifies Compliance With EmploymentLaws. In Oregon one business owner paid $30,000 for a $20 employmentlaw error. On the federal level, laws such as the Affordable Care Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, and other labor laws require employers to keep accurate records.
Employer payroll accountability increases trust. Biometric Timekeeping Simplifies Compliance With EmploymentLaws. On the federal level, laws such as the Affordable Care Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, and other labor laws require employers to keep accurate records. Document Your Policy. Nucleus Research.
Last night, I found the employmentlaw equivalent from this recent Sixth Circuit opinion. [ tl;dr: A colossal series of HR-compliance gaffes leads to a whopper of a jury verdict against the employer, which includes an award of punitive damages.]. Something like this. The plaintiff responded that she did not want to be demoted.
Employer Breastfeeding Laws for The United States: State. Breastfeeding Laws. No employmentlaws established. No employmentlaws established. No employmentlaws established. No employmentlaws established. Read the law: Delaware Code Ann. No employmentlaws in place.
The fourth exception is found in the 2007 proposed cafeteria plan regulations. To be clear, this is limited to the first 30 days of employment, not the first 30 days of eligibility and not the first 30 days after a waiting period ends. He is a contributing editor of BLR’s Flex Plan Handbook.
Here’s a brief rundown of permitted cafeteria plan benefits, both tax-exempt and taxable, courtesy of the Employer’sHandbook: Complying with IRS Employee Benefits Rules. Jennifer Carsen, JD, is a Senior Legal Editor for BLR’s human resources and employmentlaw publications, focusing on benefits compliance.
The 2007 proposed cafeteria plan regulations and other guidance provide several content requirements. He is a member of Thompson’s Health Plan Advisory Panel and contributing editor of the Flex Plan Handbook. He is a frequent speaker and author on various benefits, employmentlaw, and compliance issues.
October 12, 2007. It’s since morphed into what I hope is a useful weekly resource for employers to find the best labor and employment blog posts each week. Two more learn the hard way that off-the-clock social media use can be a job killer — via Eric Meyer’s The EmployerHandbook Blog. Also, holy heck! Technology.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act : Another gender equity employmentlaw that helped strengthen the Equal Pay Act was the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which outlawed discrimination based on pregnancy when it comes to paying, hiring, promoting, training, providing benefits, and assigning job placements for women. Ledbetter v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 318,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content