This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Behind these numbers lie real outcomes – agencies cutting time-to-hire by 40% after platform switches, dramatic differences in AI capabilities, and the hidden costs that marketing materials conveniently omit. So, let’s dive into what seasoned recruiters are actually experiencing with these systems in 2025.
. “We’re now holding TA accountable to how well the people we hired are doing,” he said, adding that determining quality of hire isn’t quite so straightforward now that GE has discontinued its performance ratings. The team relies on regular feedback from managers instead, said Knox. Measurement was nonexistent.
Business and HR leaders also need to hire talent with the right combination of technical and interpersonal skills to help companies innovate and grow. This is how modern hiring tools, such as applicanttrackingsystems, can improve the efficiency – and ultimately the effectiveness – of talent acquisition.
Although the continuing shift toward quality over quantity has kept time-to-hire from to the top of the list of important measures, efficiency is and will always be imperative to the bottom-line success of an organization and its recruitment. in June 2014 than at any time since 2001. June 2014: 25 days.
To measure its impact, compare time-to-hire before and after using the tool. Look at the breakdown of time spent on each phase of the hiring process. How much time passed from when a candidate was sourced to when they were screened, interviewed, and eventually hired?
To measure its impact, compare time-to-hire before and after using the tool. Look at the breakdown of time spent on each phase of the hiring process. How much time passed from when a candidate was sourced to when they were screened, interviewed, and eventually hired?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 318,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content