2006 Compensation Employment Law 
HRExecutive
FEBRUARY 3, 2015
According to the National Partnership for Women & Families , San Francisco became the first locality in the nation to guarantee access to earned paid sick days in 2006. In 2011, the Connecticut legislature became the first in the nation to pass a statewide paid sick days law, and Seattle became the fourth city, with Portland, Ore.,
HR Daily Advisor
SEPTEMBER 14, 2017
He received individual scores indicating he was not meeting performance expectations in 2006, 2008, and 2014, although his supervisor acknowledged that managers, including himself, had good and bad years. The company provided him additional compensation for his performance without mentioning “sales” or “sales performance.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
HR Morning
AUGUST 17, 2016
In 2006, the union filed a collective action grievance against the agency, claiming employees were being forced to work overtime without being properly compensated. This included the failure to provide compensation for “off the clock” work and “induced overtime.”. We will not stand by and let our workers get shortchanged.”.
HR Daily Advisor
JANUARY 30, 2018
The Washington Supreme Court recently held that job applicants have a claim under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) when a prospective employer refuses to hire them in retaliation for their opposition to discrimination by a different employer. Difference from Workers’ Compensation Retaliation Protection.
HR Daily Advisor
MAY 25, 2018
It may come as a surprise to some employers, but undocumented workers who are injured on the job are entitled to workers’ compensation benefits, at least in New Mexico. However, there’s an important exception that applies to all employers. In the following case, that saved the employer $144,000 in benefits.
HR Daily Advisor
JUNE 4, 2018
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) periodically has issued model special tax notices that meet the requirements of Code Section 402(f) as well as updates to those models to reflect changes in the law. Tomorrow we will look at part 2 of this article, including compensation definition and hardship distributions.
HR Daily Advisor
NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Employers are prohibited from terminating employees for asserting a legally guaranteed right, refusing to do what the law forbids, or reporting certain violations of the law. In fact, in a 2006 case, Scalli v. and an editor of Massachusetts Employment Law Letter. Wrongful discharge claim proceeds.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content