Remove 2017 Remove Employment Law Remove Exercises
article thumbnail

NLRB Looking for Clarity on Joint Employment, But Change Won’t Be Quick

HR Daily Advisor

The standard for determining joint employment has gone back and forth in recent months between employee-friendly and employer-friendly definitions as the Board and courts have tried to bring clarity to the issue. Then in December 2017, the Board changed the standard by deciding the Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Ltd.

article thumbnail

Joint-Employment Standard Back in Spotlight as Appeals Court Reenters Case

HR Daily Advisor

Funk , an editor of Indiana Employment Law Letter and attorney with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP in Indianapolis, says of the latest development. In December 2017, a Republican-majority NLRB reverted to the old employer-friendly joint-employment standard in deciding the Hy-Brand case. Circuit was issued.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

NLRB Takes Next Step Toward Employer-Friendly Rule on Joint Employment

HR Daily Advisor

But Garrison cautions that employers need to realize if they are exercising direct control over another employer’s employees, they still will be seen as being in a joint-employment relationship and will face joint-employer liability. Washington, D.C. 20570-0001.

article thumbnail

NLRB Vacates Employer-Friendly Joint-Employment Decision

HR Daily Advisor

When the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision on joint employment on December 14, 2017, many employers breathed a sigh of relief as the Board reinstated an old employer-friendly standard on what’s considered joint employment. Troublesome Tactic. Maybe Just a Hiccup. Questions on Board-Union Ties.

article thumbnail

Understanding the importance of keeping a cool head in employment decisions

HR Management

This was demonstrated in the case of Maxutova v Nunn Media Pty Ltd [2017] FCCA 2336. Maxutova v Nunn Media Pty Limited [2017] FCCA 2336. Employers should exercise caution with what they say, and, in particular, what they put into writing, when discussing an employee’s performance. Abraham Ash.

article thumbnail

Are Full-Time Employees of Staffing Companies Exempt? It Depends

HR Daily Advisor

Partner (US) LLC , 2017 U.S. 20, 2017), three full-time employees of Randstad claimed that a district court had erred in granting summary judgment to Randstad on the basis that they were covered by the administrative exemption. In Perry v. Randstad Gen. Lexis 23297 (6 th Cir. Staffing Consultant Analysis. “A

article thumbnail

Joint Employment and the FMLA: Which Employer is Responsible?

HR Daily Advisor

When a staffing agency and a client both exercise control over an employee, the staffing agency is usually considered the primary employer for Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) purposes, according to the U.S. June 6, 2017)). Department of Labor (DOL). As one recent court decision shows, however, that’s not always the case.