2005 Discrimination Policies 
HR Morning
JUNE 14, 2019
While fully paid leave may not be in the budget for small businesses, there are other options to create policies that help expectant and new moms and new dads feel valued and more likely to be loyal long term. Under the Act, a worker can’t be discriminated against based on pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions.
HR Digest
DECEMBER 31, 2019
The number of people who work from home has increased by 140% since 2005. Another important aspect that companies need to maintain is the culture of caring : a work-life balance, commitment to welfare schemes, policies for maternity and paternity leave, and vacations. Inclusivity and Diversity.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Bonusly
JUNE 2, 2021
However, 20% of LGBTQ+ Americans have experienced discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity when applying for jobs, which jumps up to 32% for LGBTQ+ folks who are people of color. Audit your policies. Are you using equitable language in your policies, like changing “maternity leave” to “parental leave”?
HRExecutive
MAY 18, 2016
Some employers “still aren’t getting it when it comes to discriminating against employees with family responsibilities.”. A clear majority of employees are succeeding with family responsibilities discrimination suits, with workers winning 67 percent of the FRD claims that went to trial from ’06 to ’15. So says Joan C.
The Employer Handbook
SEPTEMBER 29, 2020
Today, let’s see how Judge Barrett dealt with a jury verdict in the plaintiff’s favor on her national origin discrimination claim that the plaintiff brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The plaintiff sued for national origin discrimination, among other things. Proctor Hosp. Plaintiff wins!
HR Daily Advisor
SEPTEMBER 13, 2017
The steady increase in retaliation claims is likely due to a number of factors, including the fact that an employee doesn’t have to prove that she was discriminated against or harassed to proceed, and potentially succeed, on a retaliation claim. However, that changed after she filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC in May 2011.
ACA Times
FEBRUARY 22, 2017
Further, under the ACA (ACA Section 1558, added to Section 18C to the Fair Labor Standards Act) there is an explicit anti-retaliation clause, whereby employers may not discriminate against those employees who have received such a tax subsidy. Ethical Considerations in Reissues and Reexaminations (Practicing Law Institute [PLI], 2011).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
93 
Let's personalize your content