This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I have posted lengthy descriptions of each of the three eras of knowledgemanagement and here I have made a brief summary of all three. Since the term “knowledgemanagement” came into popular usage, there have been three significant changes in how organizations have thought about their knowledge.
GM was brought down by a flawed strategy, but an organization’s strategy is clearly a product of the knowledge that exists within its walls. The knowledge existed within GM to develop a more competitive strategy. The knowledgemanagement task is to bring together the collective knowledge of the organization to bear on complex issues.
I attended a meeting a number of years ago that has remained in my mind as the ideal meeting where new thinking can emerge. The invitees were twenty-five recognized thought leaders in the field of knowledgemanagement, both academics and practitioners. And so it went, with time out for snacks and meals.
One of the questions to be discussed at the up-coming Salzburg Seminar I will be attend July10-15 is, “What elements of an improvement are transferable, and what adaptations are needed?” Although we skillfully call upon that tacit knowledge to take action, we are often hard pressed to articulate the reasoning behind those actions.
I’ve just been attending an event with Globoforce and the Conference Board on social recognition. Using executive and research insights, supported by a series of ‘myth busters’, Mosley and Irvine provide a clear and compelling case for a more strategic approach – the time for Strategic Recognition is here.” Jon Ingham.
The switch to hybrid and fully remote working has required training teams to invest their time, budget, and energy into designing, developing, and delivering modern, virtual-first remote training experiences for upskilling new employees. At large employers, that figure is 187 (from a recent Freakonomics podcast)!
Last week, I attended RingCentral’s analyst summit which provided an opportunity to interact with various company executives, customers, and partners. As an example, recommending a contact center agent a subject-matter expert (SME) who’s currently available to address the issue that the agent is working on to help a client.
They can also update employees’ information, track attendance, and direct staff to relevant HR resources. Using Bloomfire’s KnowledgeManagement Software System software, Aite Group created hundreds of pieces of content for employees. The time to hire was also shortened. million subscribers. Most KPIs were unmet.
In this three part series I‘ve classified the evolving landscape of knowledgemanagement into three categories. The first category is Leveraging Explicit Knowledge and is about capturing documented knowledge and building it into a collection - connecting people to content. Leveraging Collective Knowledge.
It is quoted to encourage attending to tacit knowledge, rather than exclusively focusing on explicit knowledge. At this time, I had been in the unit a couple or three years. Another researcher who has studied the sharing of tacit knowledge is Dorothy Leonard, who wrote Deep Smarts. This kind of stuff.
The day provides time for necessary coordination and joint decision-making but also for sharing client work, exchanging professional development ideas, and working on projects. I have interacted with K&S for over ten years, working with their clients and offering the K&S consultants my own growing insights about knowledgemanagement.
Creating the environment alike home which eventually makes an employee dedicated as well to stay with the organization for a very long time. Open bookmanagement style. make a confident statement that the workforce is as passionate about the business as the management. Conclusion.
There are many insightful researchers and theorist who come from other disciplines, but have much to offer knowledgemanagers. In this post, I am reviewing his last book (he died in 2013) in which he turned his in-depth understanding to study teams in US intelligence agencies. Richard Hackman is one of those.
Google Cloud launches AI-driven management platform to tame network complexity Link ». Microsoft Ignite 2019: Meet Project Cortex, Office 365 knowledge-management service Link ». So I’ll be spending some time with that too. They really are workforce management application software in the market.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 318,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content